Thursday, September 30, 2010

Congress shows us its idea of greatness

WASHINGTON – Legislation to turn down the volume on those loud TV commercials that send couch potatoes diving for their remote controls looks like it'll soon become law.

The Senate unanimously passed a bill late Wednesday to require television stations and cable companies to keep commercials at the same volume as the programs they interrupt.

Well, it's not Glass-Steagal, but at least we'll be less likely to mute TV commercials, so that we'll hear them in the background. This was actually written for advertisers and those that advertise, such as politicians. Civilization might collapse, but until then, people will be more likely to hear commercials on TV.

At least they passed something, and now they can take a well-deserved break and make a few appearances back in the district, in heavily controlled situations (after all, there's a war on, the the peasants are revolting) in the run-up to the rigged election, to give the impression that we're more to them than a bunch of cattle being led to the slaughter. You'll eventually die and get what's coming to you, you bastards.

Obama's "state secret": He's God

That means that the president now has the power to label any American he wants right here in the United States as a terrorist and issue the order to his forces: “Take him out, now, with bullets, bombs, or drones.”

Does Obama need congressional authority before he assassinates Americans? Nope.
The ACLU sued on behalf of al-Awlaki’s father seeking a federal court injunction against the assassination. Barack Obama ordered his Justice Department to seek an immediate dismissal of the suit.

His justification? The “state secrets doctrine,” a doctrine found nowhere in the Constitution. Obama is arguing that to permit the suit to continue would mean that people would learn the details of his assassination program and the standards by which Americans and others are targeted for assassination. That would jeopardize national security, says Obama.

Maybe he can get the military to rig him up a car like the DC sniper's, and he can go out, declare anyone he sees to be an enemy combatant, and shoot them himself. This would actually be morally superior to what he's already doing to the world.

Obama admits that he's not trying to create prosperity!

Protesting against the charge that he is for "big government," Obama declared: "We [really?] don't believe that government's main role is to create jobs or prosperity."

The mind boggles at such a statement, coming from the President of the US. The Preamble of the Constitution, which summarizes the government's purpose, clearly states that the government has a role in creating prosperity:

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, PROMOTE THE GENERAL WELFARE, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

While I'm at it, I'd like to remind Congress of the following passage:

The House of Representatives shall chuse their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.

Nowhere in the Constitution does it say that the President has the power to pretend that certain portions of the Constitution don't exist, and effectively rewrite it by simply stating that "we don't think it says this," when it clearly does. "Promoting the general welfare" is defined by the writings of Hamilton and other founding fathers, which are the basis of Lyndon LaRouche's economic policies.

Barack Obama is in violation of his oath of office, which is all about abiding by the Constitution. He is a British subject, not an American. Congress, do your duty!

Wednesday, September 29, 2010

Lack of knowledge about the spiritual world can have consequences

A Rutgers University freshman who had his privacy violated after two classmates allegedly filmed him during a "sexual encounter" and posted it on the Internet committed suicide by jumping off the George Washington Bridge, authorities said.

Robert McDermott, a professor of philosophy and religion who has written several books on the teachings of Rudolf Steiner, wrote the first book I read about Steiner. In the introduction, he expressed disappointment that Steiner's philosophy was not more widely accepted by university philosophy departments. Generally, they consider teachings about the spiritual world to be superstition, and Darwinism, which has been debunked by various respected scientists, is still considered by "serious" academia (or at least what the media tells us is serious) to be the only scientific perspective on our origins. The main result is existentialism. This state of affairs can be traced back to the diabolical Paolo Sarpi, whose life was devoted to destroying human evolution.

If Rudolf Steiner's teachings were more widely taught, more people would have reason to believe that life continues after physical death, that there are consequences in the next world for committing suicide, and that suicide is not an escape. Steiner claimed that if people knew the consequences, they wouldn't commit suicide.

Furthermore, not once in reading Steiner's books or lectures did I see anything about homosexuality being evil, or even a sin. I gather that true homosexuality is due to the individual's soul-configuration during a particular incarnation. God makes us male, female, and various types of souls in between. It's a sin, in my opinion, when a homosexual tries to "recruit" an impressionable, confused heterosexual youngster. It can also be a crime.

In the case in point, the victim who committed suicide might have decided to deal with the humiliation instead of committing suicide, if he had known that it wouldn't solve anything in the long run.

Tuesday, September 28, 2010

"Drone strike prevents terrorism in London, and you can't prove otherwise. nyah, nyah, nyah"

The key to the whole case is through the looking glass. Black is white and white is black.
from JFK, the movie

British Muslims training with al-Qaeda were planning an armed rampage through London as part of a terrorist spectacular aimed at European capitals, sources told the Daily Telegraph.
A senior al-Qaeda commander from Egypt, was killed in North Waziristan [in a Predator drone strike], disrupting the planned attacks.

Well, I don't know where I ever got the notion that the British had anything to do with terrorism. Oh, yeah:
After Afghan President Karzai's statements about the helicopters flying opposition militants to the North ... a major discussion has started in Afghan media about the "ghost helicopters." In this debate, the British are pointed out openly and made a laughingstock for their double game.

But the journalist who originally made the revelation ... has in the meantime been shot by British military forces....

Might this idea of a Mumbai attack on London have been fabricated as "proof" that the British don't run global terrorism? Was there actually a drone attack in Waziristan, and if so, who was killed? As the following indicates, the reports in the media about Waziristan have little to do with the reality there:

Pakistan’s mercenary Army is conducting massive operations against the militants in the tribal region behind a smoke screen. No journalists are permitted inside the war zone. Reports about the fighting and casualties of the so-called Taliban and army as well as civilian victims are primarily based on the information, misinformation and propaganda released by government or military spokesmen.
The New York-based Human Rights Watch said the Army was targeting civilians who had voiced support for the Taliban when they controlled Swat or were suspected of providing them food or shelter. "People are taken away, and sometimes they turn up a few days or weeks later having been tortured. Sometimes they disappear. Sometimes their body is dumped with a bullet in the head," said Tom Malinowski, director for the Human Rights Watch.
Abdus Sattar Ghazali is the Executive Editor of the online magazine American Muslim Perspective

So how many of the "al Qaeda terrorists" blown to bits were infants? (Pakistan's military evidently has its own Satanist faction, and they're doing the same thing in Waziristan, with some help from the CIA, that the US did in Vietnam, such as the My Lai massacre. This of course is an oversimplification, but I believes it's a significant aspect of what's happening there.)

It's beginning to appear to me that the "Apocalypse" horde is trying to turn all thinking Americans into "militant"-sympathizers, so that we can then be branded "terrorists" and given the Aafia Siddiqui frame-up and railroad treatment.

The Poodle Peddles Heroin

Even the latest public revelations from the Bob Woodward book, appearing on the front page of Monday's Washington Post and other newspapers around the country, made clear: Obama fought against Defense Secretary Gates, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Mullen, and CENTCOM Commander Petraeus on the Afghan policy. He refused to take on the London-backed opium and heroin trade.
Russia's top anti-narcotics official, Victor Ivanov, delivered a stunning account last Friday of the massive flows of opium and heroin, through Central Asia into Russia and then on to Europe. Russia is getting zero cooperation from Obama, in combating the dope flows....

Nationwide, heroin has undergone a resurgence as a new generation of adolescents comes of age without memory of the celebrity heroin deaths that quelled the drug's popularity in the mid-1990s.
High school students can now buy enough heroin to get high for hours for the price of a McDonald's Happy Meal.

It seems that cheap heroin is an essential ingredient in Obama's "recovery."

"Thrill kill" incident and the banality of evil

(NEWSER) – Soldiers charged with murdering Afghan civilians for kicks are blaming a "crazy" sergeant that the parents of one said they warned the Army about.
The Winfields say they CONTACTED SIX ARMY OFFICES AND THEIR US SENATOR, but nothing was apparently done about Gibbs." I said my son is in Afghanistan. There's a rogue sergeant out there apparently killing innocent victims," recounted Winfield's father, Christopher. HE SAID ONE SERGEANT TOLD HIM IT'S A "HE SAID" SITUATION AND THAT NOTHING COULD BE DONE.

In response to the news from his son, Winfield called the Army inspector general's 24-hour hotline, the office of Sen. Bill Nelson (D-Fla.)....

What you have here is probably a Satanist trying to force his subordinates to take part in activity which constitutes Satanism, but without all the "magical" mumbo-jumbo typically used to disguise it as "wizardry." [1] The banal responses or lack of response from those with the authority to do something about is just goes to show how thoroughly organized Satanism pervades our government and the military. For example, the FBI actively covers up Satanism by looking in all the wrong places and declaring it to be nonexistent, and turning a blind eye to actual Satanism. I once let a policeman listen to recordings of noises produced at night by the vicious old witch next door, and after listening to a couple of the many recordings, he declared the noises to be "typical night-time noises." (Another example of the banality of evil.) His sidekick suggested that I needed psychiatric medications to "balance" my "brain chemicals." (It is typical of organized Satanism to declare those who recognize them to be insane.) When I left notes on mailboxes to let people know who was causing the disturbances, they threatened to arrest me. It's nice to know that they've got their priorities straight, that we're safe from litter on mail boxes and that Satanists are safe from exposure.

[1] The only actual "occult" ability of such "wizards" is astral projection, which actually isn't "occult," i.e. secret, although they have tried to reserve it for themselves. They typically use it to know when someone is sleeping, by being able to perceive the separation of the astral body from the etheric body, which takes place when we sleep. (The Blair Witch Project, which was a product of organized Satanism, alludes to this ability - note that the witch seems to have an uncanny ability to know when the main characters are sleeping.) When they find that someone is sleeping, they wake them up, sometimes by bashing the ground with tremendous force, while trying not to cause any noise, causing a shockwave that penetrates through everything, and the victim is jolted awake and never knows why. Anyone who thinks they can get away with this because they can hide it from humans is in for a shock when they're presented with the bill for their "fun" by the Guardian of the Threshold (the "pearly gates").

I suspect that a lot of "insomnia" is actually caused by this form of SRA, which is one of the most common forms because it's so slimy and destructive. It is very difficult to defend against this, although it is possible by using a very low-resonant-frequency (1-2 Hz) bed suspension and eliminating higher-frequency resonances. (But then, they'll realize that ground-shocks are no longer effective, and will try another approach such as producing low-frequency acoustic shockwaves which can be stopped only with massive nonresonant barriers.) The main reason this remains hidden is that so few people believe that anyone can be so low, and this is a point of pride among Satanists. (LaRouche calls this "the Beast-man syndrome.") To them, perpetrating subhuman acts without being caught (because most people assume that nobody would stoop so low) is the mark of a superhuman. Who can question such superhuman logic?

Monday, September 27, 2010

"Israel": You know what you can do with your disappointment

The US says it is "disappointed" by Israel's decision not to extend a ban on West Bank settlement building.
On Monday, bulldozers started levelling ground for 50 homes in the settlement of Ariel in the northern West Bank, and similar activity was also reported in the settlements of Adam and Oranit. But construction work was reportedly slow because of the Jewish holiday of Sukkot.

But that doesn't mean we aren't going to give them 20 advanced fighter jets (F-35's). This supposed groveling before "Israel" is actually a matter of groveling before the British empire, which created "Israel" to "fulfill prophecy" which will culminate in "Armageddon," but with no physical return of Christ - just Hell on Earth followed by a fascist dictatorship designed to drive the human spirit out of the world.

Aaifia Siddiqui convicted despite obvious PROOF of innocence!

There is nothing subtle about the evidence which proves that Aafia Siddiqui is innocent of the charges of attempted murder, etc., for which she was convicted and then sentenced partly on the ASSUMPTION that she is a terrorist! (See previous posts.) If the system doesn't correct itself, we might as well put the Constitution in a museum next to the dodo bird. The judge and all the lawyers should be subject to judicial review at the very least, and the prosecutors should be charged with prosecutorial misconduct. There is no room in a USA governed by the Constitution for such blatant disregard for truth and a defendant's rights. It was a disgusting mockery of justice, even worse than the LaRouche case because in this case, there is simple, direct proof of her innocence, and she has been through several life sentences already, if not a death sentence.

The US has stolen her life, and perhaps more than that, and she will never get it back. It has also destroyed her children's and family's lives, and apparently killed her baby. If there were any decent evidence that she is a terrorist, wouldn't it have been mentioned during her "trial?" So, the US destroyed the life of an intelligent and innocent mother of three children, and the cowardly "interrogators" who did it, who would never be found fighting a battle along with actual soldiers, but who routinely torture defenseless prisoners, are probably living high on the hog at taxpayer expense, attending parties in occupied Iraq where illegal drug use, nudity, and shooting automatic weapons at the homes of civilians is common. Such "parties," resembling frat parties on steroids, are actually Satanic "initiations" - precursors to SRA of a sort far beyond the "hazing" [>65>11, the number of Magick] rituals conducted by fraternities. To them, humanity is just a joke to be used for their own pleasure, including tortured and murdered when they get the urge. WE FOUGHT THIS "WAR" FOR SUCH CREATURES.

If AG Holder doesn't at least say something about it, his reputation will be destroyed, and what remains of the Obama administration's reputation along with it. Furthermore, Americans will know that they are no longer free, and that "their" government is evil and rotten to the core. It is not enough to allow Aafia Siddiqui to be repatriated, because her case has shown what can be done to any of us whom the government feels like calling a "terrorist." It also shows that our government goes out of its way to inflame hatred against this country, contributing to the deaths of Americans who put their lives on the line in "wars" caused by these soulless traitors, of which the Democratic incumbents are trying to buy the election, including by "coincidentally" having the BP payouts loosened up at this time.

Preliminary report on AG Holder's response to Siddiqui travesty

Daily Times — Pakistan’s Ambassador to the US Hussain Haqqani met with US Attorney General Eric Holder and expressed sentiments of the Pakistani people over the case involving Dr Aafia Siddiqui.

The envoy demanded a withdrawal of the case against American-educated Aafia, in which she had been accused of attempting an attack on US officials in Afghanistan, diplomatic sources said.

According to sources, the US attorney general said he was aware of Pakistani’s feelings and emotions over Dr Aafia’s case and that it would be decided in accordance with the relevant US laws. Meanwhile, expert sources opined that since the jury had already convicted Aafia, the judge can only determine sentence from between maximum and minimum legal terms.

Posted by D-Lo on Tuesday, September 14, 2010, at 8:40 PM

This was the only thing resembling an account of the referenced meeting that I was able to find on the internet. Hmmm. Assuming it is accurate, it confirms my suspicion that the plan is to leave Siddiqui in prison, being subjected to "enhanced interrogation" techniques (such as isolation, which she has suffered for 8 years, humiliating strip-searches, and probably others such as sleep deprivation, but since nobody can talk to her in the land of the free, we don't know) even though there is no longer any pretense of interrogating her, thus exposing this claim as a lie, again. This is, I surmise, mainly intended to provoke Muslims and contribute to the disintegration of Pakistan so that Obama can announce that "the terrorists" have obtained nukes, thus explaining his masters' planned nuclear attacks (perhaps including air bursts to wipe out electronics), intended to "fulfill prophecy" and destroy civilization.

Too bad there's nothing we can do about it, in the land of the free. If we had a right to remove traitors from office, maybe we could. But since Pelosi has taken it off the table, thus effectively amending the Constitution with a few spoken words (after all, she is God, because she works for Nazi bankers) we no longer have that right.

Sunday, September 26, 2010

Siddiqui trial: Lawyers failed to explain crucial evidence to jury

Although Siddiqui's testimony was the central focus of the day, there was another major development related to the physical evidence in the case when THE DEFENSE PLAYED A SHORT VIDEO CLIP for jurors. The clip came from a press conference that had taken place in same room as the shooting, BUT A FEW HOURS PRIOR TO THE INCIDENT, AND CLEARLY SHOWED TWO MARKS ON A WALL that the prosecution has been claiming were the result of the M-4 automatic rifle Siddiqui is alleged to have fired at the U.S. team. (The marks in the video were reportedly brought to the attention of Siddiqui's defense attorneys on Thursday morning by the prosecutors, who had themselves only noticed them the night before.) THE CLIP WAS PLAYED WITHOUT COMMENT and it's unclear if jurors understood why they were watching it, but defense attorneys are expected to assert in their closing arguments that it proves the holes could not have been the result of bullets shot by Siddiqui.

This seems like a slam-dunk case for a retrial, with new attorneys and a new judge. There could be no better evidence of her innocence, and yet her attorneys played it without commenting on it?! This is absolutely appalling, and suggests that they sabotaged her defense. The fact that the jury didn't ask about the significance of the video, and that they convicted her despite all of the other evidence that the prosecution's case was riddled with holes, also stinks.

Aafia Siddiqui's ongoing torture supports her claims of torture at Bagram

So, the family is going to obviously be calling for an appeal. We’re obviously most concerned about Aafia’s mental state, because during the trial, she clearly was not herself. She made a number of outbursts during the trial, and we think that is directly related to the trauma that she suffered while in secret prisons and while tortured for those five years while she was missing. In addition, she’s been in solitary confinement for a year and a half while in US custody. That has also contributed to her deteriorating mental state.

Solitary confinement? Back when Obama was reading campaign-related scripts before large audiences who believed that he meant what he said, he said he was going to put an end to "enhanced interrogation" and related crimes, of which one technique is long periods of solitary confinement. Can't he pull his head out of his ass long enough to read the news and fulfill his campaign promise in this case?

Another sign of the quality of "justice" she has received is that she is required to undergo humiliating strip searches each time she receives a visitor or goes to court. The implication is that she is somehow obtaining weapons while in solitary confinement and hiding them in her body cavities. They might as well just admit they're doing it for what it's actually accomplishing: humiliating her. The simply mouth their pathetic excuses ("it's policy"), providing a good example of the banality of evil, and force us to accept them with threats of death and torture. That's what it comes down to; they have no real reasons, so they have to resort to force, or at least threaten to do it.

So, if there was any doubt that her claims of having been tortured at Bagram, I think that her treatment in prison in New York is all the evidence an honest person with at least half a brain would need to conclude that she's telling the truth. (She was seen there by another well-known former prisoner, who supports the claim made by several witnesses that her Bagram ID number was 650, the digits of which just coincidentally add up to 11, the number of black magic. This might have been a hint that one of the reasons for her horrendous ordeal is to obliterate her self as part of black magic's 8th Sphere agenda. The creatures behind it might figure that if they can destroy someone as formerly intelligent and strong-willed as her, then they can destroy anyone. Her outbursts in court indicate that she still hasn't fallen in love with Big Brother (a reference to the end of Orwell's 1984), i.e. that she still has a self, which would explain why the O'Brien's of the real world, who seek to eradicate mankind from the universe, are still working on her.

Where is Congress on this issue? Considering that this monstrous injustice will tend to create terrorists, I would think that they would be interested, at least to give the appearance of being Americans.

Where is the media? Has anyone tried to interview her? Or can't the prison system find chains big enough to restrain this almost-dead 110-pound "superhuman terrorist" during an interview? (I suppose they'd also have to tape her mouth shut to prevent her from biting anyone, since she's supposedly the female equivalent of Hannibal Lecter.)

Siddiqui trial outcome predetermined

One of the many disgusting aspects of the Aafia Siddiqui "trial" is how she was "determined" to be metally fit for trial, after previously having been found to be unfit. Yet later, she was determined to be unfit to testify. So which is it? This is a case of fitting the facts on a minute-by-minute basis to a predetermined outcome, which isn't even internally consistent with itself. As one writer pointed out, her alleged involvement in terrorism was never mentioned during the trial, although it was treated as a foregone conclusion during her sentencing. This "trial" was more like the Mad Hatter's tea party, with Judge Richard Berman as the hatter. This is a prime example of how "evidence" of "Islamic terrorism" is created.

Creating "reality" by acting as if lies are truth (revised)

Whatever their mental state, their message must be taken seriously. To many Muslims, the belief that Islamists are being blamed for an atrocity carried out by Americans or Israelis fits into a larger theory that the West is oppressing Islam.

As I have written, firm opposition by New Yorkers to the Ground Zero mosque is another piece of "evidence" to believers. In short, anything and everything we say and do is proof Islam is under attack.

Tony Blair, the former British prime minister, identifies the wide acceptance of the victimization narrative as a major factor fueling terrorism. As he writes in his memoir, "A Journey," actual terrorists "are small in number, but their narrative . . . has a far bigger hold."

Blair's right, and he should know, since he's one of the few, and his British Empire controls the media that controls the "official" narrative and the levers of brute force - their final "argument." How is it that the BBC knew that WTC 7 was going to collapse, since they announced it before it occurred?

I don't see how any honest person with half a brain can look at the "war on terror" and conclude that we aren't persecuting Islam. But destroying Islam isn't the goal - the goal is to act out the British empire's interpretation of Revelation in order to destroy mankind in the guise of the fulfillment of prophecy, a.k.a. "promise keeping."

What should bother NY Post readers is that such blatant falsehoods can parade as informed opinion.

By the way, the article's title especially makes sense when "Islamic terrorism" is recognized as the myth behind the "war on terror."

The "civilized," "refined" British Empire can be seen plotting "strategic terror-bombing" OF CIVILIANS in The Shaping of the Anglo-American SS by War. Yet does the NY Post show us THAT? Of course not, since it's a sleazy imperial rag. During WWII, some munitions factories in Germany weren't bombed, even as civilians were (most famously in Dresden, which had no military significance - this incident has never been fully explained by the media because it doesn't fit into their virtual reality, which doesn't include Anglo-American mass terror, such as the needless, Satanic atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki). The same thing is going on in the reign of terror known as the War on Terror: horrific bombings of civilians by the Anglo-American SS, disguised as "Islamic terrorism." In once instance, a team of SAS bombers was found to be driving a truck full of explosives, disguised as Iraqis. In another case, a reporter who exposed the fact that the British were flying the Taliban around Afghanistan in helicopters was murdered while "escaping."

Saturday, September 25, 2010

Next: Girl Scout black ops

Operation Dark Heart' describes Lt. Col Anthony Shaffer's time in Afghanistan leading a black-ops team.

The only problem with this story is that nobody running a truly black operation would ever admit the true nature of the operation, because black operations are criminal in nature, or so secret that they can never be officially revealed because they would reveal a permanent secret policy. Take Satanism for example. Another example of a truly black operation is what was done to Aafia Siddiqui and her children, which was essentially state-sponsored Satanism. None of the perpetrators of that war-crimes spree is likely to ever write a book about it, are they?

Aafia Saddiqui case exposes Obama as the pathetic puppet he is

The case of Aafia Saddiqui beggars belief, yet the evidence that it's true is the condition of her body, and the way she is being treated despite the hell she's been through. This case includes the abduction and imprisonment of her two young children, and the apparent death of her baby.

This case has been going on for years, and although she was conveniently released from Bagram as a complete basket case at the end of the Bush-Cheney crime spree, apparently with some absurd "evidence" intended to profile her as a terrorist planted on her, and soon re-arrested and set up for attempted murder using some ludicrous story. (In the process, she was shot in the abdomen twice, probably to replace the hell of her former incarceration at Bagram. Her wounds reportedly still cause her significant pain.) Now she has been rendered to the US, convicted of these absurd charges and given an absurdly long sentence, especially considering her mental state, caused by being put through hell for years by John Yoo's "technically-not-torturers."

As a result, Pakistanis are up in arms and the "Pakistani Taliban" are threatening revenge on the US, and probably gaining in popularity and in recruits. (I find it most interesting that this provocation should come along just as the ferment in Pakistan is heating up, perhaps with the intent of unleashing chaos and giving the impression that its nukes fell into Taliban hands.) Their government seems to be giving the Pakistani people the runaround regarding Siddiqui, perhaps on orders from the British Empire. Despite their claims to want to help, they still have not signed an agreement which would allow her to be returned (see Pakistan never responded to US efforts for repatriation of Dr. Aafia to Pakistan: Diplomatic Sources). But I'm not sure what to believe.

So where is Mr. Change, Mr. Hope? Admiring his moustache in a mirror? Playing golf? Going over his latest scripts? What this country needs is an actual President, and not a script-reading British puppet.

Abbas: No peace until the "Israel"-tumor stops being a tumor

Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas told the U.N. General Assembly Saturday that there cannot be peace with Israel unless the Jewish state ceases settlement construction in areas they claim for a future state.

Of course, "Israel" will never agree to this, except to later violate the agreement, because its very reason for existing is to "fulfill prophecy," based on the British Empire's "interpretation" of Revelation. Furthermore, Obama just finished declaring that "Israel" and the US are joined at the hip. Until Satan's British Empire is overthrow, starting with Obama's impeachment or resignation, there will be no peace. The US knows this, but every once in a while (typically around election time), it has to pretend that it wants peace so that it can blame the Palestinians for not wanting it. I suspect that the Palestinians also know there's no hope that "Israel" will change its tune, and that they're bribed to go along with the charade.

Is Obama on his own hit list?

Mr. Miller of the Justice Department also said: “Purportedly on behalf of a terrorist who has dedicated his life to harming U.S. citizens, this lawsuit asks for an American court to block the government from protecting its own citizens.

If being a terrorist devoted to harming US citizens is the criterion for ordering an assassination, then wouldn't Obama have to put himself on his own hit list? Yes - if not for his double standards: it's OK to harm US citizens by destroying the economy in the name of saving it, and to commit terrorism if you call it a "war on terrorism." Besides, might makes right.

Friday, September 24, 2010

Xe frat party on steroids

Jeremy Scahill, the expert on Xe/Blackwater (Children of Cheney), has reported on some more of their wild and illegal activity, including parties which I gather were intended as orgiastic "initiations" into Satanism, apparently without women, and maybe without sex. He also reported that they obtained much of their weaponry on the black market, generously assuming that it was a way to make up for Blackwater's supposed stinginess. I suspect that they needed them to conduct "Islamic" terrorism without leaving any evidence of their true identity.

Ahmadinejad adds 2 and 2 correctly, and the Great Liar freaks

NEW YORK — President Barack Obama and Iranian leader Mahmoud Ahmadinejad traded heated remarks Friday on the emotional subject of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, and hopes for a quick resumption of talks on Iran's suspect nuclear program appeared to fade.

Obama accused Ahmadinejad of making "offensive" and "hateful" comments when he said most of the world thinks the United States was behind the attacks to benefit Israel. The Iranian president defended his remarks from a day earlier at the United Nations General Assembly and suggested that a fact-finding panel be created by the U.N. to look into who was behind them.

"It was offensive," Obama said in an interview with the Persian service of the BBC that was to be broadcast to the Iranian people. "It was hateful."

The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command. His heart sank as he thought of the enormous power arrayed against him, the ease with which any Party intellectual would overthrow him in debate, the subtle arguments which he would not be able to understand, much less answer.... With the feeling that he was speaking to O'Brien, and also that he was setting forth an important axiom, he wrote:
.....Freedom is the freedom to SAY that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
from 1984 by George Orwell [emphasis added]

"You hurt Dick Cheney's feelings! NOW we'll invade, but out of love."

One belief Satan wants us to have

In a previous post, I stated that Satan doesn't care what we believe as long as we do what he wants. Well, that wasn't entirely correct, because there is one belief required to do what he wants us to do, and that is the belief that there will be no price to pay for inflicting cruelty on others.

Satanism begins by cultivating an abandonment to our lowest impulses, such as sex and anger. For attractive libertines, there are orgies, and the unattractive or those with sexual morality are encouraged not to withhold their negative emotions. This is intended to cultivate a form of possession which facilitates the descent into SRA by heightening the sense of contempt for humans. Still, I imagine it helps to believe that there are no consequences for our actions in the next world, or that there is no spiritual world. However, there are various beliefs which can lead to this conclusion, so that this basic idea, that actions don't matter, can be made acceptable to more people.

Thursday, September 23, 2010

Aafia Siddiqu sentenced to 86 years

The instant I saw how prisoners were being transported to Guantanamo, I knew that the claim that they were the "worst of the worst" was a lie, and that they were being transported in such a bizarre manner partly to convince us that they were the most dangerous people in the world, and partly to make them suffer.

It appears to me that Aafia Siddiqui's treatment is another example of this same process of manufacturing the "terrorists" they need to justify their global "war on terror," which is in fact a reign of terror, even while they turn a blind eye to the opium in Afghanistan which the Taliban use to finance some of their operations, and while our British "allies" in the "war on terror" reportedly transport Taliban operatives around Afghanistan in helicopters.

While some might condemn Judge Berman for imposing an 86-year sentence, I don't consider myself qualified to criticize him. Only time will tell what he intended to accomplish.

Mort Zuckerman: America must continue to suffer

There is no painless, quick fix for this catastrophe. The more the government tries to paper over the housing crisis, and prevent housing from seeking its own equilibrium value in real terms, the longer it will take to find out what is true market pricing and then be able to grow from there.

Zuckerman is right about pain being unavoidable, because either the American people suffer, or Wall Street suffers. Wall Street's whorehouse known as Congress chose to let the people suffer. But his insinuation that there is no solution for the American people (other than to let the prices collapse, apparently with no protections for mortgage-holders) is wrong, and probably intended to steer us away from LaRouche's HPBA, which would have prevented the disaster and which would prevent it from getting any worse if implemented now.

Now it's the Republicans' turn to screw us

"Government is out of control in Washington," said House Minority Leader John Boehner, who stood with a dozen GOP leaders at a hardware store in Sterling, Va., today. "And we need to rein it in."

... he said, brandishing the script which his Nazi controllers gave him.

Wednesday, September 22, 2010

A sickening implication of terrorism as the occupation's dark side

In previous entries, one entitled "A purely evil agenda of the 'war on terror'," and another entitled Obama's recovery in Iraq, I lay out my Orwellian perspective of the occupation and government of Iraq, i.e. that the horrific acts of terrorism which have taken place there since the invasion are part and parcel of the occupation and government, and not, as most people assume, attempts to end the occupation and overthrow the government.

This implies that the attacks which prevented the development of infrastructure, as the financial crisis is now having the same effect, were essentially perpetrated by "our" own government against the projects which it was ostensibly trying to complete. This also required much greater expenditures on security for the projects. The hell which our government has handed over to Iraqis is a monstrous joke.

Jacob "Mammon" Rothschild gives us a lesson in "free trade climate change"

Climate change, Germany, 2010: Ve haf vays of making you go green!

A cluster of London-centered hedge funds and elite family fortunes, led by Inter-Alpha Group leader Jacob Rothschild himself, is funneling immense amounts of money into German anti-nuclear, pro-"renewable energy" groups, who are seeking to create a "Hot Autumn" of protests that would immediately end German use of nuclear energy.

The Rothschild role in funding this new upsurge, visible in the march of tens of thousands of Germans against nuclear energy in Berlin on Sept. 18, as well as mass protests against building of a high-speed rail station in Stuttgart, stems from the commitment of this British monarchy-linked financial nexus to destroy industrial progress, and thus, civilization itself.

What better example could there be to show how Synarchist bankers dictate our macroeconomic configuration? Also, note that suppressing nuclear power and rail transport exposes the Greenies as depopulators, not environmentalists, since these technologies are the ultimate in clean, renewable energy and energy efficiency.

What the hell is a "Luciferian?"

Diane Vera, founder of a New York City-based Satanist group, doesn’t think Tea Party-backed Delaware GOP Senate candidate Christine O’Donnell was ever a Satanist of any kind.
“As far as I am aware, no serious practitioner of any variant of either Wicca or Satanism would have a picnic on one’s altar,” said Vera, the founder of NYC Satanists, Luciferians, Dark Pagans, and LHP Occultists. [LHP = Left-Hand Path, i.e. black path, in this context. Also, I doubt that any organization by such a name really exists.]

Good point, but nor would any real Satanist admit to being one, or even know that he/she IS one. [Also, assuming you know that someone is a Satanist, it's a bad idea to trust them in general, because one of their main activities is lying.] For my opinion on the likely nature of Vera's supposed group, see Wicca: The Cult of Isis' "magical pagan" front and Ye Olden Con. Vera might consider herself to be a female black magician, i.e. a witch. (Interestingly, "witch" converts to 63, "wizard" to 81, and "warlock" to 81.)

I'm beginning to wonder if any de facto Satanists actually consider themselves to be Satanists. Perhaps they do, but only because they equate what is in fact Satanism with the pursuit of an initiation into black magic. I define a de facto Satanist as someone who does Satan's will by doing things that are designed to open them to possession - but again, without knowing the actual purpose of the activity. (I know of de facto Satanists who believe they're Christians. Satan doesn't care what you believe, or claim to believe - just that you do what he wants you to do. He'll tell you whatever it takes to trick you into it.) Satanism might also take the form of someone who supports organized Satanism with their obedience and discretion, for their own selfish gain (as in a group of grifters), without realizing that they're supporting organized Satanism.

However, I find it interesting that Diane Vera would claim to have founded a Satanic organization, especially one that includes "Luciferians," which to me is either a sign of ignorance, or mockery of the widespread ignorance, of the distinction between Lucifer and Satan. I suspect that Vera is either ignorant, or an actual Satanist intent on mischaracterizing Satanism to allow it to operate in plain sight. (I don't see why anyone would mischaracterize Satanism except out of ignorance or a desire to deflect our attention away from actual Satanism.)

Just as I define Satanism as a matter of opening oneself to Satanic beings, I define Luciferianism as a matter of opening oneself to Luciferic beings, which have essentially the opposite effect of Satanic beings. However, becoming Luciferically possessed, which is a hazard of mysticism, is hardly beneficial, because it causes people to become constantly "enraptured" and disconnected from the real world. I believe this is what Barbara Marx Hubbard really meant by "supra sex," despite her alternative explanations. For more detail on this topic, see the aforementioned essay Ye Olden Con.

"Luciferian" might also be a proper term for a member of a certain top-level group of initiates who are "inspired" by Lucifer (but also largely independent), although this is hardly something that could be confused with Vera's group.

Satan and Lucifer also exert their influence by constantly suggesting certain perspectives. Satan's influence is that of materialism, and Lucifer's influence can be characterized as delusions of grandeur, of being more "god-like" than we actually are. An example of the former would be PBS' constant efforts to drum Darwinism into our heads with insulting sleight-of-logic, and an example of the latter would be A Course In Miracles.

I have moderated my opinion of Christine O’Donnell, and now see her as an opportunist who plays fast and loose with the truth, and is perhaps being used by various groups to advance their agenda. But I still consider it possible that she is an actual witch, i.e. a female member of organized Satanism, whom I know for a fact are typically pathological liars, but usually better at it than O'Donnell. Furthermore, although they can be old or young, or ugly or attractive, they are cruel to outsiders at every opportunity, and strive to become more so. O'Donnell doesn't strike me as someone who would go out of her way to be cruel, but then she wouldn't show that side of herself in public.

Plausible but dubious claim that Xe commits terrorism in name of Taliban

Rock Creek Free Press/WMR has learned from a deep background source that Xe Services, the company formerly known as Blackwater, has been conducting false flag terrorist attacks in Pakistan that are later blamed on the entity called "Pakistani Taliban."

This report makes sense in light of my recent conclusion that "the terrorists" [1] are the shadow-side of the US military occupation, which continues in Iraq via its Iraqi puppets. However, the notion that the purpose of the destabilization in Pakistan is to allow the US to take custody of Pakistan's nukes doesn't fit with my theory that the US gave Pakistan nukes (which is a fact, concealed by the story about Dr. Abdul Qadeer Khan being the "father of the Islamic bomb") in order to create such chaos in the region that we could believe that the bombs were seized by terrorists. The fact that it uses former ISI chief Hamid Gul as a source is also suspicious. So, I won't claim that the report is true, only that it's interesting and worth keeping in mind.

[1] (as opposed to genuine resistance fighters who target the US military; this patriotic resistance and the majority of the US military are the good guys in this war - the bad guys are the Satanists who attack civilians and provoke the good guys.)

Tuesday, September 21, 2010

Almost time for Bernanke to stimulate his banker-buddies again?

This just in: The recession that started in December 2007 ended in June 2009, according to the official arbiter of the U.S. business cycle.
For the Business Cycle Dating Committee of the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), designating the trough month for the recession means just one thing: “Any future downturn of the economy would be a new recession,” not a continuation of the old one, according to yesterday’s press release.

To Baum's credit, she greeted this report with derision.

Lakshman Achuthan, managing director of the Economic Cycle Research Institute, appeared on CBS Evening News the day the report was released, and said that an economic recovery is analogous to being in the recovery room after surgery, and that there's still pain, and that healing has just begun. He also said that the recession which supposedly ended last year was typical, and that it will take almost a decade to get unemployment levels down to a normal level.

It seems to have been calculated to give us the impression that the Obama/Bernanke package stimulus had produced a happy ending for someone that really matters, and that now the jobs (mainly janitorial) will come along too. So, "if" there is "another recession," they'll get together and do it again.

Monday, September 20, 2010

Now Iran has WMD - trust us

Must ... attack ... Iran ... must ... attack ... Iran

A zombie is a creature that appears in books, films and popular culture. It is typically a reanimated corpse, or a human being who is being controlled by someone else by use of magic [i.e. black magic].

WASHINGTON — Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina said Monday that the United States must be prepared to use military force to prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon — and added that the last-resort step should be taken with the goal of overthrowing Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

Satan must be really turning up the heat on his minions, for the "respectable" Senator Graham to come out from behind his facade of "reasonableness."

Sunday, September 19, 2010

A purely evil agenda of the "war on terror"

Rev A: clarified paras. 1 &2

Instead of writing a new entry each time I feel compelled to explain my perspective on the terrorism taking place in the "war on terror" zone, such as in the wake of the September 19th bombing spree in Baghdad, I decided to write it once and assign a category to it. In a nutshell, I contend that it's committed by organized Satanism through various front-men, who almost always attack innocent people as proxies for each other, for purposes of the Eighth Sphere agenda, which is symbolized by Skull & Bones "class photos."

My perspective on the origin and purpose of the terrorism taking place in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan (such as car bombs, suicide bombings, the various "mistakes" being made by the US military, etc.) is largely the result of transcribing The Shaping of the Anglo-American SS by War, which I figure is so long that few people will take the time to read it. Because I considered portions of it to be crucial to understanding current events, I decided to create a condensed version consisting of excerpts. (Read this previous post on an attempt to censor the site.) If you want to read the entire article, it can be found here.

The connection didn't occur to me immediately after transcribing the article. One of the reasons I began to suspect a connection is the "rhythm" of the terrorism, the fact that it didn't seem to be affected by reported military successes against the supposed culprits (much US military action, typically that originating with Special Forces, was actually part of the terrorism), and the fact that in most cases, guilt is assigned almost immediately, and no investigation is ever performed, or at least completed.

As far as the people of Iraq are concerned, it doesn't matter who is responsible, since even if they realized that the actual culprit is organized Satanism in the form of a few layers of British puppets (as described in the Anglo-American SS article), there's nothing they can do about it, realistically. Those who tried to do something about it are dead or in some hell-hole, being driven insane or killed, a.k.a. "liberated." After observing the pattern for a while, I became convinced that the concept of "strategic bombing" OF CIVILIANS, described in the Anglo-American SS article, fit the pattern of the various forms of terrorism in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan. The "war on terror" is in fact a reign of terror being run by Satan's British empire against mankind.

So where is this "Satanic altar?"

"One of my first dates with a witch was on a satanic altar, and I didn't know it. I mean, there's little blood there and stuff like that," she said, laughing in the clip.

"We went to a movie and then had a little midnight picnic on a satanic altar," she said.

We're supposed to believe that Satanists just casually show their sacrificial altars to dabblers in "occultism" whom they date. If so, one would think that there would be many more reports of such altars.

What O'Donnell saw, assuming she wasn't fabricating the incident as part of the disinformation campaign to mischaracterize Satanism so it can hide in plain sight (which is just as likely) was more likely the setting for Wiccan rituals, which are not to be confused with Satanism except that Wiccans are suckers used by Satanists for various purposes such as practicing the art of deception and becoming "possessed" by certain people who have passed on. For more on this, see my essays on pop "occultism" (Wicca: The Cult of Isis' "magical pagan" front and Ye Olden Con).

The fact that O'Donnell appeared out of nowhere and winds up with national press coverage, as a "bona fide" contender for a Congressional seat, and backed by a major "Christian" organization, is actually much better evidence that she's a member of organised Satanism than some story about having a picnic on a blood-stained altar.

Obama's recovery in Iraq

But always -- do not forget this, Winston -- always there will be the intoxication of power, constantly increasing and constantly growing subtler. Always, at every moment, there will be the thrill of victory, the sensation of trampling on an enemy who is helpless. If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face -- for ever.'
from 1984 by Orwell

Compassion is the vice of kings: STAMP DOWN THE WRETCHED & THE WEAK: this is the law of the strong: this is our law.... ON THE LOW MEN TRAMPLE IN THE FIERCE LUST OF YOUR PRIDE, in the day of your wrath. Ye are against THE PEOPLE, O my chosen! KILL AND TORTURE; SPARE NOT; BE UPON THEM!
There is no law beyond Do what thou wilt.
from The Book of the Law by Aleister Crowley (the founding document of the modern Satanist mass-movement)

BAGHDAD – At least 29 people were killed and more than 100 others injured when a pair of bombs exploded almost simultaneously Sunday in Baghdad.
Al Qaeda has repeatedly blown up mobile phone transmission towers around the country, many of them owned by Asiacell. The group also bombed the company’s office in the northern city of Mosul in 2008
People who live near the store said THE STORE HAD BEEN WELL PROTECTED BY BLAST WALLS and by two Iraqi police checkpoints that were on either side of it.

The suicide bomber apparently drove up to a small gap between sections of the blast wall intended as a pedestrian passageway before triggering the explosion, the police said.
The Khadimiya [the other] bombing occurred in a residential neighborhood where an office of the Ministry of National Security was also located, the Iraq police said.
The police said that the casualties included employees of the ministry, an agency that works in part to prevent insurgent attacks.

“I carried a lot of victims to the ambulance — MANY WERE WOMEN AND CHILDREN,” said Ali Zamil, a police officer. [i.e. the actual targets were the people of Iraq - the claims that the bombs were aimed at the Ministry of National Security (except symbolically) and Asiacell are just cover stories - who is hurt when a cell tower is destroyed?]

The key to the whole case is through the looking glass. Black is white and white is black.
from JFK, the movie

[O'Brien]: You have read the book, Goldstein's book, or parts of it, at least. Did it tell you anything that you did not know already?'

'You have read it?' said Winston.

'I wrote it. That is to say, I collaborated in writing it. No book is produced individually, as you know.'
Do you begin to see, then, what kind of world we are creating? IT IS THE EXACT OPPOSITE of the stupid hedonistic Utopias that the old reformers imagined. A world of fear and treachery is torment, a world of trampling and being trampled upon, a world which will grow not less but more merciless as it refines itself. Progress in our world will be progress towards more pain. The old civilizations claimed that they were founded on love or justice. Ours is founded upon hatred. In our world there will be no emotions except fear, rage, triumph, and self-abasement.
from 1984 by George Orwell

The bombers aren't trying to overthrow the Iraqi government - they essentially ARE the Iraqi government. "Al Qaeda" is just the division which does its dirty work. Your tax dollars at work.

Saturday, September 18, 2010

Tormenting Iraqis, and stringing them along too

If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face— forever. from 1984 by George Orwell

From Basra: Fadhil Sarhan Manahi – 50 – retired gov employee:
"Electricity is like a dear, but reluctant visitor. It comes for two hours after four hours of no electricity – or this is supposed to be the schedule that is never implemented, because as soon as it comes it is cut again and again during the two hours. In the heat of Basra this makes people depressed and we despair of life and of any hope in the government".

I don't think there's really any serious plan to rebuild Iraq's electricity infrastructure. Note that the US has pulled back now that it's given plenty of time for organized Satanism in its various guises to rape the place, to create a new army of pod people for Satan out of its members, and to unleash the Reesian mind-destroyers to fine-tune their techniques for creating utter hopelessness by creating Hell on Earth. (The unpredictability of the electricity is probably part of it.) Now it's just a matter of maintaining the status quo and telling the Iraqi people that there will be sufficient electricity in a couple of years, by which time they probably figure the global economy will collapse and there will be a major conflict which their "economists" will be able to cite as the reason their "recovery" never materialized. Or something like that.

Below, I have included excerpts from various articles which support my claims, and I've added comments in brackets.
“Neither the ministry of electricity nor the government has done anything wrong; both are doing their job. All that happened is a delay in our plans to boost electricity due to lack of money because of the international financial crisis which has hit the whole world, not just Iraq,” Thamir al-Gadhban, head of Maliki’s cabinet and the prime minister’s oil adviser, said.
The government said it spends roughly 3.5 billion US dollars on electricity generating and infrastructure projects each year. Deals to build power plants and improve Iraq’s faulty electricity grids have been signed with international corporations General Electric and Siemens, BUT THE RESULTS ARE YEARS AWAY.
“The ministry needs five billion dollars per year, and we get around 1 to 1.2 billion. According to our plans, electricity was meant to be provided to Iraqi citizens at a rate of 12 hours per day in 2010, and 24 hours per day in 2011. But the lack of money has changed all our plans; we could not build new power plants or fix the old ones. To improve the electricity situation, we need to increase the budget,” Deputy Minister of Electricity Raad al-Hares told IWPR.
[The financial situation is only getting worse, without a global Glass-Steagall.]
As US combat troops leave Iraq this month, one of the problems left behind is a critical shortage of electricity for ordinary Iraqis.

The problem used to be blamed on the insurgency, but now -- with the insurgency largely quelled -- it is a measure of the future economic and political challenges the country faces instead.
To deliver the power supplies Iraqis want, the new electricity minister will have to reverse what since 2003 has been a history of massive investment with little result.
But many observers say that the goal of adding 5,000 megawatts over the next two years may be too ambitious to be completed on schedule.

Hamish McNinch, a former British Army engineer who served as principle energy adviser to coalition commanders in Iraq in 2008 and 2009, commented last month in "The Wall Street Journal" that buying new generators is the easiest part of the energy equation.

"The construction and commissioning of the full power plants is the real challenge," he wrote. "That's a job for consulting engineers and construction companies, NONE OF WHOM HAVE YET BEEN SELECTED, LET ALONE CONTRACTED, TO START THE WORK."
from Electricity Shortages in Iraq by Charles Recknagel
Why has supplying this basic public utility proved so difficult? Hinks said he could not go into too many details about Kabul because his company is in the midst of contentious international arbitration with the prime contractor there. But having built transmission lines in some of the most dangerous parts of Iraq during the most dangerous years (from 2003 to 2007), he had a few key points he wanted to make. Though technical and administrative, what they came down to is the fundamental question of priorities. WASHINGTON NEVER QUITE REALIZED, OR AT LEAST NEVER FIRMLY DECIDED, THAT TURNING ON THE LIGHTS SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF ITS LIST. And when the great military-industrial contracting machine did focus attention, in short spurts, IT TENDED TO THROW MONEY AWAY ON PRIVATE SECURITY CONTRACTORS and wildly expensive air transport of heavy machinery and even trailers to house personnel.
Whether one agrees with this or not usually depends on whether one supported or opposed the invasion. The conservative view was expressed by David Brooks in an opinion piece entitled “Nation Building Works” in the New York Times this week. In an article packed with statistics, Brooks gloated over what he sees as Iraq’s thriving economy.

Prof Juan Cole, of the University of Michigan, is representative of liberals who opposed the war. “Iraq has been put through the gates of hell,” he says. “The US invasion didn’t cause everything in a direct way, but it set off everything that happened. It’s a wounded society . . . Brooks’s faith in nation building, based on statistics, is typical of American positivism, but doesn’t reflect reality.”
[Brooks was just trying to salvage his credibility, since he was a major cheerleader for the invasion. So, he lied some more.]
While the U.S. protection of the British-sponsored opium production in Afghanistan started under the Bush-Cheney Administration, it was Obama who ended all eradication of opium, and ended the efforts to eliminate the drug lords and traffickers who fund the Taliban and other insurgencies.
[I included this as an indication of Obama's chaos-agenda for the region. There is an abundance of evidence that the Taliban are controlled by the British empire. For example, see The British/Saudi Slush Fund and the Rise of Wahhabism and British Kill Afghan Journalist Who Exposed Their Double Game in Afghanistan. So, naturally Obama would protect one of their main sources of funding.]