Sunday, October 2, 2011

Acting as if there's evidence: what's in a conviction for the Kerchers?

(AGI) Perugia - "They are shocked by the insisting media rumours of a possible acquittal of Amanda Knox and Raffaele Sollecito". That's what Francesco Maresca, lawyer of Arline and Stephanie Kercher (mother and sister of murdered student Meredith Kercher), said. Arline and Stephanie will be in Perugia tomorrow to attend the verdict of the appeal trial of Amanda Knox and Raffaele Sollecito. Francesco Maresca pointed out that "these insisting rumours carry on, despite the fact that the Court of Appeals will decide in chambers in a few hours". . .

So let's destroy two more innocent lives to avoid hurting the Kerchers, whose motives are dubious. While we're at it, let's ask them if there's anyone else whose life should be destroyed to soothe their feelings.

Another angle on this is that it's a part of Mignini's strategy of pretending to KNOW that Knox is guilty, to have some INADMISSIBLE, TOP SECRET EVIDENCE (the Neo-con strategy), thus manufacturing "evidence."