Monday, October 29, 2012

Did Obama say something about victory over Al Qaeda?

During the height of Iraq's civil war, neighbouring Syria was a sanctuary for Iraqis - but as the Syrian conflict has intensified, Iraqi refugees have again been forced to flee, this time back to their homeland, as the BBC's Caroline Hawley reports from Baghdad.
[...]
The country they are returning to is significantly safer than the one they left. But bomb attacks are common, and there are fears that al-Qaeda in Iraq is now regrouping.

Virtually every day police officers or government officials are assassinated using guns equipped with silencers.

Baghdad is a city of blast walls and checkpoints. But the tight security too often fails.
from Iraq: No escape from danger for returning refugees

What we need is a war on terror.

Sunday, October 28, 2012

The Taliban: US dirty-faction's partners in the Af-Pak reign of terror

KABUL, Afghanistan (AP) — Police say Taliban militants have pulled five Afghan civilians off a bus in eastern Afghanistan and shot them dead.
from Afghans: Taliban kill 5 civilians grabbed off bus
But the journalist who originally made the revelation to President Karzai [i.e. that British Special Ops had been seen delivering Taliban terrorists via helicopter to various locations], and was preparing another article about similar transport of militants by helicopter from Afghanistan to Xinjiang in western China, has in the meantime been shot by British military forces under mysterious circumstances.
from British Kill Afghan Journalist Who Exposed Their Double Game in Afghanistan

However, only in 1994—almost 15 years after the Soviet invasion began—did the world come to know about the rising force called the Taliban. Afghanistan had never had a politico-religious group of that name, nor had Afghans even heard about the group before. The Taliban was created as a handmaiden of outside forces, including:

• Saudi Arabia, which indoctrinated a group of Afghans by funding the establishment of thousands of madrassas inside Pakistan;
• The Pakistani Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), which acted at the behest of Islamabad to gain control of Kabul through a proxy and dependent rag-tag group; and
• British intelligence, which saw the Taliban as a potent ally that would further British interests in Afghanistan and Central Asia by undermining all sovereign nationstates.
• All this, while Washington watched the development from a distance, essentially encouraging it.

To be precise, the Taliban is a laboratory product, created to unleash instability throughout the area. The instability is essential for the empire builders, and those who know how the British Empire was built in the 18th and 19th centuries, would recognize the phenomenon in a flash.
[...]
It also became evident in 2001, when the U.S. Special Forces, with the help of the Tajik-Uzbek-Hazara dominated Northern Alliance, breezed through Afghanistan and took control of the whole country in six weeks, that the Taliban could not fight. Although the Bush Administration did not divulge it at the beginning, IT SOON BECAME PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE THAT WASHINGTON HAD ALLOWED THE PAKISTANI GOVERNMENT TO RESCUE THOUSANDS OF AFGHAN TALIBAN, PAKISTANI ADJUNCTS OF THE TALIBAN, PAKISTANI ISI AND ARMY OFFICERS, AL-QAEDA VOLUNTEERS, AND ISLAMIC MOVEMENT OF UZBEKISTAN (IMU) MEMBERS FROM THE NORTHERN AFGHAN CITY OF KUNDUZ. It is almost a replay of how the bin Laden family members were spirited out of the United States, just hours after the 9/11 attacks, when the entire airspace of the United States was under lockdown.

The defeated Taliban and al-Qaeda had fled to Kunduz after losing battles across the north of the country, and many were surrendering. But then, something inexplicable happened. Over a three-day period, Pakistani military planes made non-stop flights in and out of the Kunduz airport, which was controlled by the Taliban. All the important Taliban commanders and Pakistanis escaped along a safe-flight corridor, supposedly guaranteed by the Americans. That airlift, which American soldiers called “Operation Airlift of Evil,” made the Northern Alliance soldiers livid. The Indian government sent diplomatic protest notes to the American and British governments. The Kunduz airlift story became available to the world much later, when a high-level CIA officer, Gary Berntsen, who was reportedly the second-in-command during the operation, described it in his book.
from Look Who Created the Taliban: Saudi Arabia and the Brits
by Ramtanu Maitra (to find article, Google title)

I'm assuming that the "Taliban" who committed this crime (and it was simply cold-blooded murder - no honorable warrior would do such a thing) are the variety that work for the British empire with the purpose of "unleashing instability," as stated in the above excerpt. As in the case of the attempted murder of Malala Yousufzai (the Pakistani girl crusader for girls' education), it seems like something intended to provoke "reprisals" by the small US Sat, uh, dirty faction, which of course won't kill those responsible, since they're actually working with their ostensible enemies, and waging war on mankind together with a false narrative superimposed upon it by the government and media.

Saturday, October 27, 2012

Why Cheney's former lackey Victoria Nuland hates Daniel Casillo

The man who unwittingly breached John F. Kennedy Airport's state-of-the art security system after his jet ski failed in New York's Jamaica Bay was trying to get caught as a way to be rescued.

"I didn't mean to do this, but I exposed something really important, and that's a flaw in security," Daniel Casillo told ABC News Tuesday.
from Jet Skier Who Exposed JFK Airport's Security Tried to Get Caught
After forcefully denying it last week, State Department spokesman Victoria Nuland admitted yesterday that a British private security company, the Blue Mountain Group, was contracted by the State Department to provide security for the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya, where the U.S. Ambassador and other Americans were murdered on Sept. 11.

According to Wired.com's "Danger Room," the State Department signed a contract with Blue Mountain on May 3 to provide security for the consulate, even though Blue Mountain is not on the State Department's list of approved contractors for diplomatic security.
from British SAS-linked Firm Was in Charge of "Security" at Benghazi Consulate

Obama's "disposition matrix," a secretly-crafted killing list, is now the centerpiece of Obama's counter-insurgency policy, and the killing operations are likely to be extended at least another decade, the Washington Post reports today, citing unnamed senior Obama Administration officials.
from Drone Killings: Obama Trying To Lock-in the Policy for Future Administrations

What Daniel Casillo exposed is the fact that the US  is not threatened by any terrorists which the British empire (which includes the US governement) doesn't control - including in Libya. 

The article on Obama's intent to perpetrate the drone-terror policy into the foreseeable future supports my claim that the "war on terror" is actually a reign of terror.

So, British imperial spokeswoman Victoria Nuland, a holdover from Cheney administration, is no doubt rather PO'd at Casillo for exposing a bit of the reality behind the "war on terror" illusion, and I suspect that that the incident will be swept under the rug as quickly as possible.

Sunday, October 21, 2012

"Counter-attacks" for Benghazi attack predicted

In a column entitled "U.S. Justice Likely Coming Soon to Benghazi with Extrajudicial Executions," he points out that, in searching for a response to the 9/11-Two attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Obama has no intention of taking any prisoners and subjecting them to due process. As reported by AP, yesterday, the U.S. will "simply target the suspects with U.S. covert action," which means execute them without any due process at all.
from Greenwald: Expect Obama To Kill in Benghazi....

My instant reaction to the news of the attack was that it was intended to "justify" a wave of "counter"-[>96>666] terror, i.e. "misdirected" Satanic terror deliberately aimed at people who had nothing to do with the attack, which is the fundamental stuff of this "war."  Tarpley's article referenced a couple of posts back lifts the curtain on the neo-con groups who are choreographing this "war" by running terrorism of all flavors, as well as by fanning the flames of hatred against their impending targets. For example, he implies that John Bolton was behind the recent notorious video which was supposedly the motive for the Benghazi attack. 

Saturday, October 20, 2012

"Assad" conveniently provides more impetus to invade Syria

BEIRUT—Lebanon's capital was rattled Friday by its most destructive bombing in nearly four years, killing an intelligence chief who has been a longtime adversary of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and stoking fears that Lebanon is being drawn into the war in neighboring Syria.
from Beirut Blast Fans Fears That Syria War Is Spreading

Well, this couldn't have been another example of organized Satanism waging war on mankind and using its media to blame its next target, since anyone who values their internet connection, and knows what's good for them in general, knows that organized Satanism doesn't exist, and that Christ is about to wipe out organized Satanism (despite its nonexistence) and set up an Earthly kingdom despite his clear statement in the New Testament that his kingdom is not physical.

Wednesday, October 17, 2012

Benghazi attack fits pattern of "War on Terror"

To Libyans who witnessed the assault and know the attackers, there is little doubt what occurred: a well-known group of local Islamist militants struck the United States Mission without any warning or protest, and they did it in retaliation for the video.
[...]
At a news conference the day after the ambassador and three other Americans were killed, a spokesman for Ansar al-Shariah praised the attack as the proper response to such an insult to Islam. “We are saluting our people for this zeal in protecting their religion, to grant victory to the prophet,” the spokesman said. “The response has to be firm.”
from Election-Year Stakes Overshadow Nuances of Libya Investigation

In other words, these "Islamic fundamentalists" are admitting their willingness to kill people who had nothing to do with creating the video or any supposed responsibility for suppressing it. (What about the Arabic media's responsibility for suppressing it? Weren't they the ones that did so much to make it widely known in the Muslim world?) This just goes to illustrate my characterization of the "war on terror" as "misdirected" tit-for-tat terrorism committed by the Devil's henchmen pretending to be fighting each other, but actually killing innocents in their crossfire.  For an article with more details than you probably care to know, which supports my position, see Romney campaign, CIA Mormon Mafia both responsible for Benghazi attack.  Tarpley's "Mormon Mafia" designation is probably a reference to yet another group of Devil's advocates hiding behind a facade of piousness. LaRouchePub.com and LaRouchePAC.com have also been covering this terrorist attack in detail, and point the finger at the same evil crowd, which was also behind the Al Majalah massacre.

Sunday, October 14, 2012

Another Ubuntu blog (Rev A)

(Rev A)

After my experience with recovering from the NSA dirty-ops (even their "clean" ops are "black") cyber-attack, I realized that someone needs to clarify the process of getting going with Ubuntu, so I decided to create just such a blog, and here it is. As of this writing, the format has a problem, and I'll work on it.

Revision:

The format has been changed, and all of the posts have been reworked and reorganized into a single post.  I think it's ready for public consumption.

Wednesday, October 3, 2012

A Satanic sacrifice in Benghazi

Sept. 24—Within days of the mass circulation of Lyndon LaRouche's statement, demanding Obama's immediate impeachment for his complicity in a new 9/11, and for ignoring specific warnings of a possible attack in Benghazi, Libya (see last issue), the White House coverup of the truth about the attack on the U.S. consulate there, began to unravel. The most noticeable shift was when, on Sept. 20, White House press spokesman Jay Carney was forced to admit that the Sept. 11 killing of Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other U.S. employees was an act of terrorism. Just days earlier, he and U.S. Ambassador to the UN Susan Rice had been desperately claiming that the attack was a spontaneous act of mob violence in response to a pathetic anti-Islam movie trailer posed on YouTube, and not a premeditated attack on the anniversary of Sept. 11, 2001.


from Obama's Coverup of Benghazi, New 9/11, Starts To Collapse

The purpose of this attack appears to have been to fan the American public’s anger toward Islam in general in order to gain our tacit approval for “reprisals” (“misdirected” terrorism with innocents as victims – you know, the stuff of the War on Terror reign of terror) although as usual, precise motive is essentially impossible to know.  The attack was supposedly triggered by that disgusting anti-Islam video, although it’s more insulting to the average Muslim to believe that it was the trigger. Instead, it shows how stupid organized Satanism thinks we are, or wants the rest of the world to believe we are, which we would have to be in order to believe that Muslims would respond in such a manner to a hate-video produced by an American slimeball.  The other, less violent “protests” were obviously staged.

The attack itself bore the hallmarks of a typical Satanist sneak attack with overwhelming force, merciless brutality, and with little if any risk to the perpetrators (its “revaluated” notion of valor), as in the case of night raids and drone attacks (as epitomized by the Al Majalah massacre.  Such attacks are the most likely cause of genuine Muslim outrage.