To Libyans who witnessed the assault and know the attackers, there is little doubt what occurred: a well-known group of local Islamist militants struck the United States Mission without any warning or protest, and they did it in retaliation for the video.from Election-Year Stakes Overshadow Nuances of Libya Investigation
At a news conference the day after the ambassador and three other Americans were killed, a spokesman for Ansar al-Shariah praised the attack as the proper response to such an insult to Islam. “We are saluting our people for this zeal in protecting their religion, to grant victory to the prophet,” the spokesman said. “The response has to be firm.”
In other words, these "Islamic fundamentalists" are admitting their willingness to kill people who had nothing to do with creating the video or any supposed responsibility for suppressing it. (What about the Arabic media's responsibility for suppressing it? Weren't they the ones that did so much to make it widely known in the Muslim world?) This just goes to illustrate my characterization of the "war on terror" as "misdirected" tit-for-tat terrorism committed by the Devil's henchmen pretending to be fighting each other, but actually killing innocents in their crossfire. For an article with more details than you probably care to know, which supports my position, see Romney campaign, CIA Mormon Mafia both responsible for Benghazi attack. Tarpley's "Mormon Mafia" designation is probably a reference to yet another group of Devil's advocates hiding behind a facade of piousness. LaRouchePub.com and LaRouchePAC.com have also been covering this terrorist attack in detail, and point the finger at the same evil crowd, which was also behind the Al Majalah massacre.